SUNSET PARK — Editor’s Note: In the continuing battle over a re-zoning proposal along the waterfront in Industry City, intense negotiations are underway between City Councilman Carlos Menchaca and Andrew Kimball, CEO of Industry City. A recent letter from Kimball and a response. by Councilman Menchaca are instructive to readers who follow this issue. Even as this exchange is published here, meetings and negotiations continue.
ANDREW KIMBALL LETTER TO COUNCILMEMBER CARLOS MENCHACA
September 19, 2019
Dear Council Member Menchaca:
We are in receipt of your letter which provides specific suggestions and a constructive path forward for Industry City and, more importantly, for the residents and businesses that comprise the Sunset Park Community. We look forward to creating a legally binding framework to secure their implementation.
From the beginning of the effort to reactivate Industry City, you have sought to forge a process with outcomes that benefit all of Sunset Park. You have also sought to resolve critical issues now rather than waiting until the end of the process while pointing out the flaws in ULURP. And, like those of us at Industry City, you have worked to create economic opportunities that benefit Sunset Park and honor its legacy as a great working-class neighborhood, while also acknowledging that there are market forces and many as-of-right development options that could take the project in a very different direction. Your letter is an important culmination to that effort.
On that note, it is clear to me that you and I desire the same outcome for what the reactivation of Industry City could and should mean for Sunset Park. In fact, that’s what motivated me to join the Industry City team six years ago, after a decade leading the largest resurgence of manufacturing in New York City since the 1950’s. I firmly believed that with the right conditions, the great success achieved at the publicly owned Brooklyn Navy Yard could be replicated by the private sector.
Now, five years after we initially discussed our redevelopment plan with you, I believe that we have made significant strides towards achieving goals important to the future of Sunset Park. Since that time, with $400 million invested (including $100 million spent for goods and services at local businesses):
• Employment has grown dramatically from fewer than 1900 people working here in 2013 to nearly 8,000 people working here today;
• The number of entrepreneurs realizing their dreams and the number of businesses creating opportunities here has spiked from 150 to more than 550; and
• Today there is more manufacturing taking place at Industry City than at any time in several decades.
And to ensure that the benefits stay close to home, with your support and in partnership with a number of community-based organizations and academic institutions, we created Innovation Lab the first privately initiated job training and business support center in New York City. As you noted in your presentation to the community Monday, the Innovation Lab has had some positive results and working together we can do even more.
Today, more than half of the IC workforce lives in Brooklyn and one in every five people who work at Industry City live in Sunset Park.
While I am proud of these achievements and appreciative of the role you and a number of other area stakeholders have played in creating these results, I am confident that the regulatory changes sought through a rezoning create an opportunity to achieve significantly greater results working together that are sustainable in the long-term.
That is why Industry City has agreed to adjust our vision to more fully align with the one you articulated in your letter. At your request, we now commit that we will support:
• Removal of hotels from the Special Permit that we are seeking; • Establishment of a mechanism to ensure the provision of an irreducible amount of space restricted for industrial uses within the proposed Special District;
• Establishment of a manufacturing hub managed by a mission-driven non-profit;
• Further restriction of the total amount and location of retail uses within the proposed Special District.
We also agree to your request that we are fully prepared to negotiate and execute a legally binding Community Benefits Agreement with a community-based organization with support of the appropriate City agencies on the following:
• Establishing a public technical high school and adult education center at Industry City;
• Expanding and enhancing the Innovation Lab to connect more Sunset Park residents to jobs, support worker cooperatives, and provide training and research around green manufacturing;
• Establishing a manufacturing hub that is managed by a mission-driven non-profit to ensure industrial businesses including those focused on climate resilience and adaptation-have long term access to space and support in Sunset Park;
• Promoting existing Sunset Park businesses through the tenanting process, and establishing programs to incentivize Industry City tenants to source locally;
• Providing Industry City roof space to expand the Sunset Park Solar Cooperative;
• Providing support for tenant organizing, education and advocacy efforts in Sunset Park.
Finally, we agree that the challenges currently confronting Sunset Park reach far beyond Industry City and our ability to fully resolve these issues. And, we are confident that the policies in place by our current administration and our City Council will lead to important investments in education, housing, community services and infrastructure that will benefit the Sunset Park Community. The leadership of Industry City has and will continue to advocate for such public investments.
We very much appreciate your thoughtful leadership and look forward to continuing to work with you throughout the review process which we believe will start on Monday, September 23, 2019 with certification of our application by the City Planning Commission.
Andrew H. Kimball
STATEMENT FROM CARLOS MENCHACA ON INDUSTRY CITY’S RESPONSE TO HIS SEPT 17 LETTER
“After months of listening to my neighbors, I feel more sure that no matter what lies ahead for Sunset Park, we will build a better future for our neighborhood.
“The ideas I presented on Monday night are full of promise and opportunity for our neighborhood. That is why I am deeply disappointed with Industry City’s response. While I commend Mr. Kimball for agreeing to modify Industry City’s application, and expressing shared values, he failed to acknowledge the most important value of all, the one underwriting my conditions for success: accountability.
“The establishment of a group who would sign one end of a community benefits agreement has yet to be established, let alone a facilitator or legal counsel identified. Any attempt to rush through a rezoning process without the community being fully prepared to hold Industry City accountable is something I will never support.
‘Industry City can still do the right thing and agree to work with us to define a timeline that works for everyone. However, if they decide to certify their application on Monday, September 23rd as indicated in their letter, I will oppose their rezoning proposal and vote against it should it make it to the floor of the City Council.
“While saying no in this way concerns me, because it still leaves in place Industry City’s ability to exacerbate Sunset Park’s most pressing challenges, my commitment to accountability is greater, for the success of any policy depends on it.
“After my presentation and subsequent conversations with my neighbors in the days since, I know there is strong interest to create an effective community benefits agreement and pursue the agenda I outlined for addressing gentrification, displacement, rising rents, unpreparedness for climate change, and the preservation of our manufacturing and industrial waterfront.
“Moving forward, I invite Mr. Kimball to reconsider, but if he will not, then I look forward to working with the Sunset Park community, the Council, and the Mayor’s office to build off my proposal for how we can address our challenges.”